| Decatur, Ala. | Wednesday, May 22, 2013 |
|
There’s not much low-hanging fruit in the state’s effort to trim the General Fund budget, but the retirement program for retired district attorneys is one.
The state’s General Fund is paying almost $6.5 million a year to just 47 retired district attorneys. They qualify for benefits after 10 years — less than two terms — of service.
The package includes an annual salary of $111,952, plus health insurance and expenses. The salary is about 75 percent of the $148,936 a year the state pays active district attorneys.
There are only two drawbacks for the retired district attorneys. They can be called back into service on a short-term basis. And when they die, their spouses receive nothing.
“It sounds like a really good deal until you pull back the rug and start looking at it,” said Randy Hillman, executive director of the Office of Prosecution Services and state District Attorneys Association.
“That’s a lot of money,” said state Sen. Arthur Orr, R-Decatur, who is chairman of the Senate committee that oversees the General Fund.
So the retirees and taxpayers have an incentive to change a system that is costing the state’s financially strapped General Fund too much money.
The district attorneys cannot participate in the state’s standard retirement plan because they are subject to being called back to work.
But that doesn’t mean they can’t contribute to their retirement during their full-time working years, as Orr wants them to do.
State Rep. Marcel Black, D-Tuscumbia, said he is OK with examining the retirement package, but he doesn’t want to change the benefits for those who already have retired. Although the program is too generous to the district attorneys, it is the agreement under which they retired.
State legislators and the District Attorneys Association are discussing changes.
As Orr and others suggest, the alterations should include retirement contributions from the district attorneys while they are working full time. Also, widows or widowers of district attorneys should continue to receive retirement pay similar to the standard state retirement plan.
These changes are fair for the district attorneys, a better deal for spouses and taxpayers, and should be implemented in the next legislative session for future district attorneys.
|
Not registered? Click here
|
E-mail this
|
Print this
|
| Decatur Daily | @DecaturDaily |
| High School Sports | @DecaturPreps |
| Living | @DecaturLiving |
| Seth Burkett | @DD_SethBurkett |
| Bill Campbell | @DD_BillCampbell |
| Deangelo McDaniel | @DD_Deangelo |
| Eric Fleischauer | @DD_Fleischauer |
| Bayne Hughes | @DD_BayneHughes |
| Ben Montgomery | @DD_BMontgomery |
| Meredith Qualls | @DailyMeredith |
| Mary Sell | @DD_MarySell |
| Ronnie Thomas | @DD_RonnieThomas |
Finally, a DD editorial I agree with. Unfunded liabilities such as this need to go. That's why you don't really see companies offering pensions. Having people on the payroll that aren't doing work is counter productive to the bottom line.
As I have previously written, its an "Entitlement." When the story appeared in the DD exposing this government/political scam, I wrote about those with political connections feeling entitled to the taxpayers' money. Examples I listed were retired DAs, aerospace & defense industry contractors (SEE Mo Brooks' tantrum about funding for his political supporters being cut), millionaire farmers in the TN valley, etc... "Entitlements" take many forms. They aren't limited to social security, medicare/medicaid, unemployment benefits, etc...