Morgan County Sheriff Ana Franklin said that though she supports citizens’ rights to bear arms, a report by a law-enforcement group that she has pledged to stop any gun control efforts by President Barack Obama isn’t true.
Franklin said she never signed any pledge or “vowed not to uphold any federal laws,” but her inclusion in a list published by the group may have stemmed from a Facebook post she made addressing county residents’ concerns about possible gun control legislation.
The Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association in a post on its website Wednesday listed Franklin among 90 sheriffs and two state sheriffs associations across the country that “vowed to uphold and defend the Constitution against Obama’s unlawful gun control measures.”
“I applaud these public servants for their courage and conviction,” said the poster, identified in a Reason.com blog as CSPOA head Richard Mack. A secretary who answered the phone at CSPOA office said Mack was traveling. He did not return the phone call.
“I don’t know where that came from. I don’t know who those people are,” Franklin said.
She also appeared on another list published on Constitution Club USA’s website Jan. 19, alongside Madison County Sheriff Blake Dorning and Houston County Sheriff Andy Hughes. Hughes also made the CSPOA list.
Following the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting that left 20 children and six educators dead last month in Newtown, Conn., many gun owners began to fear a new federal crackdown on firearms.
The gunman, Adam Lanza, who also killed himself and his mother, used a high-powered rifle owned by his mother, who reportedly was a gun enthusiast.
Franklin said she suspects a Jan. 18 post about gun control, which received 420 “likes” and 120 comments on her “Sheriff Ana Franklin” Facebook page, drew the national attention as it spread across the Internet. It was shared more than 600 times on Facebook alone, she said.
“A lot of people who were concerned and asking, ‘Are you going to come in and take our guns if they disallow them?’ and I said, ‘No.’ There’s no local law enforcement agency that is going to come and take people’s guns. Not in Alabama,” she said.
Her post went further, though, saying “nor will we stand for any federal agent to violate our citizens’ constitutional rights” and that she took her oath of office understanding that “County Sheriffs may one day be our last line of defense against a government that seeks to reach outside its lawful bounds.”
It also said one reason citizens should be armed is in case they need to be deputized by the sheriff.
“The 2nd amendment was framed to insure that the people would be armed and able to fight for a righteous and lawful cause,” it said.
The post made no mention of the current administration.
Franklin said she was trying to allay fears, not encourage anti-government sentiments. She said federal agents intruding into homes and confiscating weapons is an unlikely scenario, but many had posed questions about it.
“I didn’t say I think it’s coming to that,” she said. “I just wanted to let them know I get it. I wanted them to know that I did understand what my duties were and what my position would be if it ever did come to that.”
Franklin said she stayed silent on the issue for weeks, despite being bombarded with questions from the public.
“You would be surprised by the normal people — not the people that are really out there — that are concerned right now about the government and what they’re going to do about guns,” she said.
Franklin said she believes there should be restrictions on who is able to purchase and carry weapons, but such restrictions are already in place and she doesn’t see a need for new laws.
“We need the power and ability to enforce the ones we have and the means to deal appropriately with criminals and the mentally ill that fall through the system,” she said on Facebook.
Seth Burkett can be reached at 256-340-2446 or sburkett@decaturdaily.com.
|
Not registered? Click here
|
E-mail this
|
Print this
|
| Decatur Daily | @DecaturDaily |
| High School Sports | @DecaturPreps |
| Living | @DecaturLiving |
| Seth Burkett | @DD_SethBurkett |
| Bill Campbell | @DD_BillCampbell |
| Deangelo McDaniel | @DD_Deangelo |
| Eric Fleischauer | @DD_Fleischauer |
| Bayne Hughes | @DD_BayneHughes |
| Ben Montgomery | @DD_BMontgomery |
| Meredith Qualls | @DailyMeredith |
| Mary Sell | @DD_MarySell |
| Ronnie Thomas | @DD_RonnieThomas |
Why not?! Take the pledge sheriff.
Yes, why not? The entire Sheriffs Association of Utah-30 out of 33 Sheriffs- took the pledge. Most of the sheriffs of Oregon, Arizona, and over a hundred Sheriffs have made the pledge.
Many more sheriffs haven't...
@ Momofgirls
Maybe they didn't maybe they were hijacked as was Anna! Maybe they feel the same as Anna and thi group is now putting words in the Sheeriffs mouth. Further more this is a knee jerk reaction to garner fear.
Anna was right when she said this "We need the power and ability to enforce the ones we have and the means to deal appropriately with criminals and the mentally ill that fall through the system,” she said on Facebook.[Sic] Whats fallen through the system is the loop holes at gun shows that's it.
There are people out there that make money selling fear they will tell you Obama's gonna take you gun then they what you to give them money to fight him. Ever get a call wanting you to support a law enforcement agancy for bullet proff vest and alike? The sheriffs office doesn't solicit but they will sell their name to those that do.
The only pledge she needs to sign is the one she made with me the voter nobody else goes ahead of me no groups no associations no pac's no one!
Hear hear, casinokid! Very well put. The sherriff is not beholden to some organization with a pledge. She is beholden to US.
The government would kill 20 kids in order to kill our Bill of Rights..collateral damage.
Casinokid: Talk about selling fear. Can you articulate what the "gun show loophole" is? Please tell us exactly what that is. If you can do that, I'll continue to engage in this debate.
The cash and carry no background check that's what the Sheriff is referring to as no being enforced.
Huh? I'm not sure you even have a clue what you're talking about. Do you believe that there are no background checks being done at gun shows? Is that what "the gun show loophole" is? Well, you are mistaken. If a federal firearms licensed dealer sets up a booth at a gun show, they are required to do the same checks that they do if they were in a store. The ONLY people who are making transactions without a background check are private citizens who are not "in the business" as a firearms dealer. If I own five guns and I want to sell four of them, I can rent a table at a gun show and sell them. This is no different than if you wanted to sell your friend a shotgun in your living room. This is a private sale. There is no "loophole". Loopholes are unintended. This was intentional. Did you even read the article? She didn't even say anything about the so-called "gun show loophole". You can't enforce a law that doesn't exist.
@Casinokid . . . very well put. Very well.
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2013/jan/30/us-gun-control-leahy/