After intervention by two different appellate courts, a teacher charged more than two years ago with having sex with students faces possible termination from Decatur City Schools and possible trial on criminal charges that had previously been dismissed.

Two different rulings by Morgan County Circuit Judge Glenn Thompson pertaining to 45-year-old DCS teacher Carrie Witt, one in a criminal case and the other in a civil case, were reversed by appellate courts.

In a decision posted Monday, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals reversed Thompson’s Aug. 10 ruling that dismissed two felony counts that she had sex with students under 19 years old. Both students were male, according to Decatur police, attended Decatur High and had been students in a class taught by Witt. One was 17 when the physical relationship started and the other was 18, according to police. Thompson had ruled the statute was unconstitutional as applied to Witt.

Nick Heatherly, one of Witt’s lawyers, said Monday that Witt is in the process of appealing the Criminal Court of Appeals' decision.

The ruling by the Criminal Court of Appeals also reversed a decision by Thompson dismissing sex-with-student charges against David Solomon, 28, who was a contract teacher at Falkville High School. He was fired by the company he worked for after his March 29, 2016, arrest. The appellate court remanded both cases to the Morgan County Circuit Court.

Thompson last week, abiding by a June 22 order of the state Supreme Court, lifted his injunction that had prevented DCS from initiating disciplinary proceedings against Witt. She has been on administrative leave with full pay and benefits since the charges were filed.

Superintendent Michael Douglas said Monday he has tentatively scheduled a due process hearing for Witt on Aug. 14, the earliest date possible under the Students First Act.

The 2011 law replaced the state’s tenure law and requires the school system to give tenured employees advance notice before holding termination hearings, said a spokeswoman with the Alabama Association of School Boards.

Since placing her on leave, the school district has spent more than $128,000 on salary and benefits for Witt. She received a 4 percent raise during the 2016-17 academic year that increased her annual salary to $52,060, school records show.

If her contract is not terminated before Oct. 1, she will receive a second raise of $1,270 because the Legislature last session authorized a statewide 2.5 percent increase for teachers and support workers to be paid from the Education Trust Fund.

Witt, who was assigned to teach U.S. government, economics, International Baccalaureate psychology and 12th-grade International Baccalaureate history at Decatur High, was arrested March 21, 2016.

In November 2016, former DCS Superintendent Dan Brigman scheduled a termination hearing for Witt, but her attorneys successfully argued that holding the hearing before the board while criminal charges were pending would force Witt to choose between the “risk of self-incrimination if she testified” or “losing her teaching contract if she did not,” according to court documents.

Thompson on Feb. 28, 2017, issued an injunction preventing the board from taking any action against Witt. Attorneys for the school district appealed his ruling and the state Supreme Court last month ordered Thompson to lift his injunction. He did so Wednesday, although the court file he sealed remains concealed from the public.

Thompson’s ruling that the sex-with-student law was unconstitutional concluded it was overly broad.

"This Court acknowledges that a disparity of power may inherently exist in a teacher/student relationship, but it clearly does not exist between every school employee and every student regardless of where the student is enrolled," Thompson wrote. "By eliminating the requirement that the state show a position of authority, grooming, abuse, coercion, or lack of consent, the state criminalizes behaviors outside the state's legitimate purpose."

The state Attorney General’s Office appealed the ruling, and lawyers for Witt and Solomon argued that the state has no legitimate interest in regulating consensual sexual acts. They also argued the law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution “in that it criminalizes a personal relationship between two consenting parties that is not criminalized between other similarly situated parties.”

The Court of Criminal Appeals ruled that Thompson’s order was in error because the burden of proving the law was unconstitutional should have been placed on the defendants, and they failed to meet that burden.

“Moreover,” according to the appellate court, “there exists a legitimate state interest in prohibiting intimate contact between a teacher and a student.”

The court quoted a Kansas court decision upholding the constitutionality of a similar law.

“Teachers have constant access to students, often in an unsupervised context,” the Kansas court ruled. “Thus, teachers are in a unique position to groom or coerce students into exploitive or abusive conduct. It is uncontestable that the state must provide a safe school environment for students, which includes preventing the sexual exploitation of students.”

The same reasoning applied to this case, according to the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

“The state had a legitimate interest in prohibiting Solomon’s and Witt’s conduct and in protecting minor students from school employees’ sexual advances,” the court ruled.

Violation of the law prohibiting a teacher from having sex with a student under 19 is a Class B felony punishable by up to 20 years in prison, with a requirement that the convicted defendant register as a sex offender.

- or 256-340-2469. Twitter @DD_Deangelo. or 256-340-2435. Twitter @DD_Fleischauer.
Get Unlimited Access
$3 for 3 Months
Subscribe Now

(3) comments

Belinda Newell

To me, the root of this court case has nothing to do with guilty or not guilty. The act being right or wrong. It’s about how an older adult, who’s accused of committing the same act (who just happens to work in a different profession) can’t be criminally prosecuted.
If that’s the case, then the state of Alabama needs to implement a sex law that applies to EVERY adult who works in ANY profession.
For example:
If ANY adult, REGARDLESS of their profession, over the age of (fill in blank) who has sex with a person under the age of 16 has committed sexual abuse and or rape.
But the laws aren’t set up that way (which makes it discriminatory). The current law basically states that an adult (as long as they’re not a school teacher that is) can have sex with a teenager as long as they’re 16 years or older. This’s one of the reasons why the the judge ruled the law unconstitutional. The same law should apply to every adult. Plain and simple!
IF Carrie is guilty (because nobody really knows the truth or motives behind it all) is going to be criminally prosecuted, then EVERY adult who has committed the same act should be too because their profession has absolutely nothing to do with the act being right or wrong. It’s the SAME act committed against a person who’s the same age...which in turn makes the the current law biased.
I’m sorry, but if I were to be criminally prosecuted for an act (in which Joe Blow down the street also committed), why should I be the only one charged for it?
Not to mention, there have been numerous documentaries and articles to support teachers being falsely accused of things like this. One poor teacher was accused and convicted...only to have the student fess up (over a decade later) that it never happened. The former student came forward because she said that she couldn’t live with herself any longer! She admitted that after making her false accusations, the school system, police, and her family fueled the fire. They had all this publicity! She admitted to being so far deep into all of her lies against her teacher that she felt as though she couldn’t turn back. She was scared of being publicly labeled a liar. She was afraid that she may be criminally prosecuted for making the entire story up etc etc. Meanwhile, this teacher lost his job, his career, his family, served time in prison, and publicly labeled a pedophile.
With all of the technology we have access to nowadays....teenager are A LOT smarter than we give them credit for. My kids can do stuff on their iPhones with certain apps that I never knew existed! There are apps where you can face swap/photoshop people into pictures (and it looks so real). There are voice recorders that can impersonate another person’s voice. I mean good grief! If you truly wanted to set somebody up… I guess nowadays you can do it and that to me is FRIGHTENING!

Dixie Boy

Hormones can be impossible to control for some...


It's about time!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.