The Decatur City Council stirred up a hornet’s nest when it implemented a tax on the police jurisdiction, which took effect April 1.

The slogan “taxation without representation” is thrown around a lot, but it is accurate when it comes to police jurisdictions. The police jurisdiction is an area that extends from Decatur’s city limits to a point 3 miles beyond those limits. Because it does not extend into other municipalities and does not go into Lawrence County, the actual area within the police jurisdiction generally is less than 3 miles.

Residents outside Decatur’s borders long have been frustrated with the police jurisdiction. Indeed, its creation in the 1970s sparked protests that led to the incorporation of Priceville. That frustration became more vocal when the City Council in January passed a sales and use tax which will affect businesses and industries in the police jurisdiction.

The city points out, with some validity, the tax merely reimburses it for some of the costs of supplying police and fire services to the police jurisdiction. Opponents complain they never requested Decatur provide such services. Their most poignant complaint, however, is the council’s action amounts to taxation without representation.

The accuracy of this complaint is obvious. It is almost inconceivable the City Council would have raised taxes within the city limits, especially with elections coming in August. It took minimal political courage to raise taxes in the police jurisdiction precisely because those affected by the tax do not vote in city elections.

The issue is not quite as simple as the opponents would suggest, however, especially when it comes to fire protection. Numerous manufacturing plants dealing in hazardous materials lie just beyond the city limits. Chlorine gas leaks and toxic smoke plumes do not abide by political boundaries. In the event of a large-scale disaster, most of the casualties would be in densely populated Decatur, not in the sparsely populated police jurisdiction. The volunteer fire departments that would cover the area outside the city limits but for the police jurisdiction do an excellent job, but they are not equipped to deal with hazardous materials.

Likewise, criminal enterprises do not honor city borders. A drug lab outside the city limits will market its product within the city.

The need for the city to provide police and fire coverage outside city limits is an argument for a police jurisdiction, but not necessarily an argument for a tax in the police jurisdiction. While residents outside the city limits receive incidental benefits from the police presence and fire protection, the intended beneficiaries of those services are Decatur residents.

The issue is not simple. Residents outside the city of Decatur have a legitimate complaint, but the City Council had valid reasons for imposing a tax.

The proposed boycott, however, makes little sense. Those threatening to boycott Decatur businesses have a gripe with the City Council, but their main frustration is with the state Legislature. And while they have no representation on the council, they do have representation in the Legislature.

Decatur retailers have no dog in this fight. Opponents of the police jurisdiction have some good arguments, arguments which the Legislature has the authority to resolve. Indeed, there are bills pending in the Statehouse which would address many of their concerns.

Police jurisdiction opponents should be pressuring their elected state representatives, not targeting Decatur businesses that have no say in the matter.
Get Unlimited Access
$3 for 3 Months
Subscribe Now

(2) comments

charles kirby

The PJ's best answer is to petition the Morgan County commission to ask the legislative delegation for a county wide referendum on ending all PJs. This will clear up any questions regarding "the will of the people"! Decatur residents will overwhelmingly support the PJ residents in this matter. How can anyone be opposed to "the will of the people".

charles kirby

Actually, the legislative deligation is "scared to death" to end the corporate welfare for industry in the PJ. This fear has been sold to them by one or two people. It is corporate welfare because it is subsidized by Decatur's population; much of which lives at the poverty level and has no chance at those jobs. Vast numbers of those plant employees live in Madison or Huntsville which pay nothing to support those jobs. Our tax abatements, issued by Decatur's Industrial Development Board have no standards to justify return on investment. Furthermore, our IDB's lawyer is PAID BY THE INDUSTRY ITSELF to get said abatements. No performance is ever measured, reviewed, or sadly even requested. The last company that even asked its employees to live in Decatur was TRICO NUCOR. WHile NUCOR is Decatur's largest corporate citizen and taxpayer, most of the industries claim they don't need and don't want Decatur. Not once has any of these industries questioned why their taxes are paid to Morgan County but Morgan County is never asked to perform the necessary services. These are some questions that should be asked: (1) Why does the area around Huntsville survive so well without a PJ. Why are their first responders so non-concerned of protecting their citizens from this "horrible threat"? (2) If giving corporate wefare to our indusatries is so necessary and supposedly benefits our retail sector, then why is our retail sector so fragile? It is clear that most or all the benefits of this corporate welfare is MYTH. (3) Follow the money, who benefits from Decatur supplying subsidized services to industry that doesn't want its employees living in Decatur? Who doesn't want a measuring standard?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.