On Wednesday, 13 House Republicans barged into a meeting of the House Intelligence Committee to protest the committee’s ongoing impeachment probe.

Among the Republicans participating in what was nothing more than a publicity stunt were Rep. Mo Brooks of Huntsville and Rep. Bradley Byrne of Fairhope. Brooks has never shied away from attention, and was on CNN shortly afterward shouting about the Democrats’ “sham” investigation while ignoring the reporter’s questions about the substance of the accusations against President Donald Trump.

Byrne took to Twitter.

“Adam Schiff just SHUT DOWN his secret underground impeachment hearing after I led a group of Republicans into the room. Now he’s threatening me with an Ethics complaint! I’m on the Armed Services Cmte but being blocked from the Dept. Asst. SecDef’s testimony. This is a SHAM!”

Schiff, D-California, is chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

The 13 Republicans make a big deal about the “secret underground impeachment hearing,” but what they fail to mention is the 47 Republicans who are actually part of the hearing.

On Thursday, Byrne tweeted again, saying “Adam Schiff and his cabal are conducting secret hearings in the bowels of the Capitol, violating House precedent & withholding non-classified information.”

This is simply false, except that the committee chamber in question is in the “bowels” of the Capitol, which is meant to sound sinister. In fact, the precedent has already been set, under rules approved by former Republican House Speaker John Boehner and enacted by the Republican majority.

In short, the Democrats are operating under the same rules the Republicans were when the Republicans were investigating Benghazi in an attempt to turn what was, admittedly, a policy disaster into a political scandal.

Back then, the Republican committee Chairman, Trey Gowdy was all in favor of private witness interviews. “The private ones always produce better results,” he said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” in October 2015.

Unfortunately, we can probably look forward to more stunts from the House minority as the House leadership moves forward with its impeachment inquiry.

Byrne, for one, is running for U.S. Senate in a GOP primary race in which the main issue so far has been “how loyal are you to Trump?”

These theatrics don’t change the fact, however, that a lot of damning evidence is emerging from these hearings.

Wednesday’s storming of the committee hearing didn’t stop the hearing. It simply delayed it.

Right now, however, the focus is mostly on the previous day’s testimony by acting Ambassador William Taylor, who said the Trump administration was threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine unless Ukraine’s leaders investigated Hunter Biden, the son of former Vice President Joe Biden.

Taylor is not some far-out Democratic partisan. He was appointed acting ambassador by Trump’s Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

The House impeachment inquiry is serious hearings by serious people dealing with serious issues — under rules enacted by the previous Republican majority.

The House Republicans who barged into the closed hearing Wednesday made a mockery of the proceedings. They should be embarrassed.

Get Unlimited Access
$3 for 3 Months
Subscribe Now

(3) comments

Jai Redmon

When faced with a Democrat led kangaroo court, what did you expect?

Chuck Johns

.....so sayeth the local comrades.

This is an fishing expedition, just like the Mueller "investigation". If there were high crimes and misdemeanors committed, make the charges and lets have BOTH sides present their cases. Schiff is just trying to make a kangaroo court look official, scaring people with unlawful subpoenas to desperately find ANYTHING that might, in a liberal mind, be construed as a crime.

Just like the Mueller disaster, this is much ado about nothing, and will only result in a waste of money and divert the legislative branch further from their jobs of running the country.

Scott Spearman

Mr. Johns. How do you "make the charges" without first doing an investigation? What is "kangaroo" about this court? Remember it includes the 47 republicans are members of the 3 relevant committees. And, as pointed out in the article, these hearings are being run according to the rules put in place in 2015 by the Republican Majority in 2015 for the "Benghazi" investigation.

Do you really think that using stealth out of band "diplomacy" and withholding critical military aid to an important ally for the sake of furthering a purely political and partisan agenda is "much ado about nothing"? I think its a huge abuse of power and the very type of thing that the founders envisioned when they added impeachment to the constitution.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.